tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13338143.post9117605960433078825..comments2023-05-14T03:44:54.726-05:00Comments on CourageMan: Bishop SignorileCourageManhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13446189695845365897noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13338143.post-49244268874881755452008-01-12T09:49:00.000-05:002008-01-12T09:49:00.000-05:00With her sturdy gait and bear-wrestling style, I a...With her sturdy gait and bear-wrestling style, I am blown away that she is doing any "outing"...<BR/><BR/>That being said, we can expect more of the same - she is a bully. A smiling bully.A Simple Sinnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06710927638399318664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13338143.post-80519731479152189642008-01-08T10:39:00.000-05:002008-01-08T10:39:00.000-05:00CM --I think you are a little off the wall here. ...CM --<BR/><BR/>I think you are a little off the wall here. Naming, hinting at a particular person or giving enough factors as to come close to IDing a particular person is one thing. Suggesting that somewhere among the thousands of Anglican bishops there is another active gay person is not a great revelation. For those who find some value in Anglican unity, it is probably important to remind folks that Bishop Robinson is hardly the first gay bishop or even the first widely known to be gay bishop, though modern communication certainly spreads that information farther and in a more recordable form.<BR/><BR/>Using the same (I think unfair) measure you use, some might object to your statement as to "...heels (even if those heels be Prada-clad)" as making a suggestion about the Christian bishop most widely known to wear Prada shoes. I doubt that was your intention, but still, it seems more objectionable that the Presiding Bishop's mild observation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com